Required listening... House of Lords - Can't find my way home
This version kicks. There's just no other way to describe it. Shivers. Turn...it...up!
Disclaimer: No false statistics were supported, displayed or harmed in the making of this post.
When I first saw this photo I thought he had clothes coming back from the cleaners in the back seat. After looking at it a bit I realize that there are people in the background.
Now I am wondering if it is possible to bring clothes back from the cleaners. Sounds like another accessory for the designers to consider.
The following 1 user Likes shome's post:1 user Likes shome's post • DiscjockeyDale
Like many people who work at a desk, he´s wearing a dark grey suit. And even if he´d just picked up some clothes from the dry cleaners, he´d only get back home without his suit and the clothes being covered in dust IF THERE WERE DOORS AND ENCLOSURES!
It´s just not good enough to repeatedly maintain that they´re `coming soon´. Or that they´re just so easy to fit later on etc. etc.
Discussions as to whether there´s space for a cup holder etc are inconsequential compared with the possibility of enclosing the passenger compartment. Is this becoming the elephant in the room? Why hasn´t Arcimoto at least shown us a bit more than pretty photoshop `renderings´?
04-13-2018, 03:19 PM (This post was last modified: 04-13-2018, 06:12 PM by Rickb.)Go To Post #1
(04-13-2018, 08:05 AM)paravil Wrote: Like many people who work at a desk, he´s wearing a dark grey suit. And even if he´d just picked up some clothes from the dry cleaners, he´d only get back home without his suit and the clothes being covered in dust IF THERE WERE DOORS AND ENCLOSURES!
It´s just not good enough to repeatedly maintain that they´re `coming soon´. Or that they´re just so easy to fit later on etc. etc.
Discussions as to whether there´s space for a cup holder etc are inconsequential compared with the possibility of enclosing the passenger compartment. Is this becoming the elephant in the room? Why hasn´t Arcimoto at least shown us a bit more than pretty photoshop `renderings´?
For the future base model FUV Owners that don’t require an enclosed three wheeler motorcycle, the cup holder is a far more important option. We can buy an after market cup holder and lockable box for our vehicle registration/insurance paperwork. The good news is that there is no raging bull. Regarding the hard and softshell enclosure options:
(04-13-2018, 08:05 AM)paravil Wrote: Like many people who work at a desk, he´s wearing a dark grey suit. And even if he´d just picked up some clothes from the dry cleaners, he´d only get back home without his suit and the clothes being covered in dust IF THERE WERE DOORS AND ENCLOSURES!
It´s just not good enough to repeatedly maintain that they´re `coming soon´. Or that they´re just so easy to fit later on etc. etc.
Discussions as to whether there´s space for a cup holder etc are inconsequential compared with the possibility of enclosing the passenger compartment. Is this becoming the elephant in the room? Why hasn´t Arcimoto at least shown us a bit more than pretty photoshop `renderings´?
So... when they come out with the doors and enclosures...
Will you buy one?
Required listening... House of Lords - Can't find my way home
This version kicks. There's just no other way to describe it. Shivers. Turn...it...up!
Disclaimer: No false statistics were supported, displayed or harmed in the making of this post.
I´ll quite definitely buy a small, narrow (less than 80cm width), electric or hybrid powered tandem two seater with tilting technology and fully eclosed (removeable side panels) with a max. speed of over 100km/h when it´s made by a company I can trust according to internationally accepted safety norms. The technology is not revolutionary, so it´s possibly worth waiting for.
Until then, I´ll carry on observing how so many small sartup companies try and fail to sell their flawed dream product. I´m sure the point has been adequately made with the Solo. Please don´t ask me to list all my criticism of both the SRK and the Solo. The list would be just too long (and would probably be a legal liability when dealing with EM).
04-14-2018, 02:00 PM (This post was last modified: 04-14-2018, 02:07 PM by DanCooper.)Go To Post #1
Wouldn't a Toyota I-Road come close to what you want? For my needs, the FUV will be much better. Many roads here, even in town, have traffic faster than the I-Road can go. I would like to see a lot of data on how an active tilter would handle potholes, sand, snow, and ice before I would consider one. In a town where you aren't surrounded by impatient drivers in SUVs and pickups, and where the roads are well maintained, the I-Road might work out.
Another thing us that a large established manufacturer does not give any assurance that the product will be supported. Suppose it turns out that the market will only support sales of a few thousand units a year. Toyota will walk away from it, while Arcimoto may be able to be profitable at that level.
Think Toyota´s given up on the iRoad. The design was flawed (rear wheel steering, limited top speed). Tilting three wheeled scooters are quite popular here. I´ve tried one out and it was a lot safer than my hot bike. What makes the SRK and the Solo interesting is the question of their acceptance under the given international certification categories.
I used scissor lifts for many years, and driving backwards to take advantage of rear-wheel-steering greatly enhanced my maneuverability in tight spaces. I certainly wouldn't try that in a car on a road. Far too unstable.